Abstracts – Browse Results
Click on the titles below to expand the information about each abstract.
Viewing 5 results ...
Craighill, A L (2002) Lifecycle assessment and evaluation of construction and demolition waste management, Unpublished PhD Thesis, School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia.
Foulds, C (2013) Practices and technological change: the unintended consequences of low energy dwelling design, Unpublished PhD Thesis, School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia.
Graham, J (2018) Governance of systems of social practice for sustainability: Developing a reflexive systems of practice approach for governance of sustainability, Unpublished PhD Thesis, , University of East Anglia.
Monahan, J (2013) Housing and carbon reduction: can mainstream 'eco-housing' deliver on its low carbon promises?, Unpublished PhD Thesis, School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia.
Moncaster, A (2012) Constructing sustainability: connecting the social and the technical in a case study of school building projects, Unpublished PhD Thesis, School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia.
- Type: Thesis
- Keywords: construction project; efficiency; government; policy; procurement; sustainability; timber; trust
- ISBN/ISSN:
- URL: https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/40584/
- Abstract:
This thesis traces the political interpretation of sustainability, and its translation into practice in English school building programmes during the period 2000-2010. Social power theory is used to analyse the complex network of decisions, and their consequences, through case studies of policy development and of building projects. The thesis describes how the control of appointments to task forces and of the issues considered allowed Government to manage the framing of the policy agenda while seeming to validate industry perspectives. The process led to a political interpretation of sustainability that translated into two main technical solutions: improved operational energy efficiency and low-carbon energy technologies. Within construction projects the potential power of professional experts to produce alternative solutions is also demonstrated, through the example of the successful introduction of cross-laminated timber to reduce embodied carbon. Outcomes are therefore shown to have been substantially influenced by the exercise of both political and professional power. The thesis also shows the unintentional power effects of procurement processes and design tools in defining and limiting possibilities, the restricting power of the professional systems within which the actors operate, and the power of numbers to provoke unreflective trust. These effects are shown to have led to some irrational solutions, with the thesis demonstrating that the energy technologies installed in three projects are likely to produce higher, not lower, carbon emissions. These multiple power effects have therefore constrained thinking and possibilities for the interpretation of sustainability for construction, have limited the subsequent translation into practical solutions, and have had a substantial and at times negative effect on the material performance of the resultant buildings. In addition the technologies and numbers have not only been used, and therefore governed, by the actors but also appear to have governed them, limiting their actions and understanding of sustainability.